﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>California Society of CPAs / Estate Planning / CalCPA Discussion Forum  / Property tax reassessment for a somewhat complicated situation / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>California Society of CPAs</description><link>http://forums.calcpa.org/</link><webMaster>forums@calcpa.org</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:13:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Property tax reassessment for a somewhat complicated situation</title><link>http://forums.calcpa.org/Topic832-2-1.aspx</link><description>Was there an aggregate community property agreement?</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:11:05 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>John Jacobson</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Property tax reassessment for a somewhat complicated situation</title><link>http://forums.calcpa.org/Topic832-2-1.aspx</link><description>I was a little confused by your statement that the trust is the IRA beneficiary but the IRA is not in the trust. The IRA cannot be in the trust. The IRA makes distributions to the trust based on the life of the oldest trust beneficiary (in most cases) - to put it into the trust would make it 100% taxable. You always keep the IRA intact although you may want to have it titled as a beneficiary IRA.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:56:37 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Mary Kay Foss</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Property tax reassessment for a somewhat complicated situation</title><link>http://forums.calcpa.org/Topic832-2-1.aspx</link><description>I'm not sure what county you're in but here in Contra Costa we see this transaction a lot. The trust owns the house before the sale and owns the house after the sale - so no reassessment. This is despite the fact that the "living" trust owned it first and now a trust that is part of that trust owns it.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:54:11 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Mary Kay Foss</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Property tax reassessment for a somewhat complicated situation</title><link>http://forums.calcpa.org/Topic832-2-1.aspx</link><description>Assuming that the surviving spouse is the present beneficiary of the bypass trust, my guess is that there is no reassessment because the present owner would not change.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:55 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>John Jacobson</dc:creator></item><item><title>Property tax reassessment for a somewhat complicated situation</title><link>http://forums.calcpa.org/Topic832-2-1.aspx</link><description>Please bear with me as I give you the facts, because there are several events that took place.&lt;P&gt;1.  Taxpayer and spouse created a living trust and wife died in 2008.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.  Taxpayer had a house worth 2 million plus about 800,000 in other assets in the living trust.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.  Taxpayer also has retirement accounts worth 3.5 million in his name.  The named beneficiary on the retirement accounts is the living trust.  None of these retirement accounts are currently in the living trust.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4.  Ordinarily the bypass trust can not be funded for the full 2 million dollar amount because the decedent's community property share of the trust estate was 1.4 million.  However, the trust has a provision whereby any disclaimed property is to be added to the bypass trust.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5.  We went ahead and prepared the 706.  The surviving spouse made a valid disclaimer and we transferred the 2 million dollar house to the bypass trust.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We would now like for the survivor's trust to buy half of the house back and for the bypass trust to carry a demand note at a fair market interest rate.  The note would be secured so that the surviving spouse can take the interest deduction.  The bypass trust would recognize the interest income, but would distribute it back to the taxpayer because it is a simple trust.  Only a million or half of the house is being sold, because you can only deduct mortage interest on a loan up to one million dollars.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason we would like to do this is in case the real estate market should rebound, and the surviving spouse should sell the house some day.  we would like to be able to take advantage of the Section 121 deduction for the portion of the house owned by the survivor's trust.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The big question in all of this is whether or not the house can be reassessed by the county tax assessor, on the sale of 50% of the house back to the survivor's trust?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't seem to reach the right person at the assessor's office.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:56:54 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Mike Hagedorn</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>