California Society of CPAs
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
        



Joint Tenancy "For Convenience Only" for... Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 6/27/2006 7:31:46 PM
Member

MemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMember

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 10/9/2009 1:02:49 PM
Posts: 7, Visits: 20
I have a situation where the decedent and surviving spouse held a securities account in joint tenancy.  They had also established and funded a revocable trust with community assets, but one-half of those assets is not enough to utilize the full estate tax exemption amount.  In addition, they each have IRAs, the beneficiaries of which are the surviving spouse.  There is no community property agreement in place.  I believe there is nothing that can be done about the IRA accounts at this point, but would it be possible to take the position that the joint tenancy securities account was held in joint tenancy for convenience only and would therefore be available to add to the trust and increase the amount being funded into the bypass trust?
Post #156
Anonymous
Posted 6/28/2006 7:10:50 AM




Donita,

If the account funds originated from community property and there was no valid transmutation to separate property, you may have a chance. The issue is will you be disclosing the determination on the 706 and on the income tax returns when gain based on step up in basis is shown.

Nelson
Post #157
Anonymous
Posted 6/29/2006 9:03:04 AM




to add on to Nelson's comment- I have seen attorneys request court approval of this treatment... and have been told that this makes it harder for IRS to disagree

mike allmon
Post #158
Posted 6/29/2006 11:09:31 AM
Power Member

Power MemberPower MemberPower MemberPower MemberPower MemberPower MemberPower MemberPower Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 3/12/2011 12:58:57 PM
Posts: 147, Visits: 823
If the account has been established for a long time, isn't it possible that there was an *oral* community property agreement? I thought that oral agreements were allowed if the agreement and the account predated some date in the early 90's when the law changed.

Mary Kay Foss
Post #161
Anonymous
Posted 6/29/2006 11:12:49 AM




You are right. The change was about 1980 as I recall and there is a court case a few years old on this issue.

That old rule should be considered.

Nelson
Post #163
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »


All times are GMT -8:00, Time now is 1:08pm

Powered by InstantForum.NET v4.1.4 © 2012
Execution: 0.078. 8 queries. Compression Disabled.